1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 237 N.J.
  5. 237 N.J. Super. 452 (1989)
 

DOMANOSKI v. BOROUGH OF FANWOOD

237 N.J. Super. 452 (1989)

568 A.2d 123

DONALD DOMANOSKI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF FANWOOD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. DONALD DOMANOSKI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 29, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Silver argued the cause for appellant (Michals, Wahl, Silver & Leitner, attorneys for appellant).

Israel Gazek argued the cause for respondent Domanoski.

Robert J. Young argued the cause for respondent Borough of Fanwood (Hoagland, Longo, Oropollo & Moran, attorneys).

Before Judges PRESSLER, LONG and LANDAU.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

This is a workers' compensation case. Petitioner Donald Domanoski, a police officer employed by respondent Borough of Fanwood, sustained an injury while arresting a shoplifter in a supermarket owned and operated by respondent Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A & P). Petitioner was, at the time of the arrest, off duty and working as a security...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases