1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 230 N.J.
  5. 230 N.J. Super. 430 (1989)
 

KODE HARBOR DEV. ASSOC. v. ATLANTIC

230 N.J. Super. 430 (1989)

553 A.2d 858

KODE HARBOR DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, A PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, NEW JERSEY, THE DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, THE DIVISION OF PLANNING, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 6, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Winkelstein, Atlantic County Counsel, argued the cause for appellants (Michael Winkelstein, attorney; Michael Winkelstein and Terry J. Dailey, Assistant County Counsel, on the brief).

Barbara Sardella argued the cause for respondents (Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish & Kauffman, attorneys; Barbara Sardella and Nelson C. Johnson on the brief).

Before Judges DEIGHAN, BAIME and D'ANNUNZIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

This appeal presents difficult questions of statutory construction relating to various sections of the County Planning Act (N.J.S.A. 40:27-1 et seq.). N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 empowers a county planning board to review a site plan where the property to be developed is located "along [a] county road[]." The same statute confers jurisdiction on a county planning board to review a site plan where...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases