1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 233 N.J.
  5. 233 N.J. Super. 310 (1989)
 

INFANTE v. GOTTESMAN

233 N.J. Super. 310 (1989)

558 A.2d 1338

ANTHONY F. INFANTE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL H. GOTTESMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 16, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Anderson argued the cause for appellant (Gertler & Hanna, attorneys).

Allan J. Shechet argued the cause for respondent (Shechet & Spector, attorneys).

Before Judges MICHELS, LONG and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Anthony F. Infante appeals from a summary judgment of the Law Division entered in favor of defendant Michael H. Gottesman, an attorney-at-law licensed to practice in the State of New Jersey, in this action to recover damages on theories of breach of contract and quantum meruit arising out of the performance of investigative, paralegal and other services involving defendant's law practice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases