1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 237 N.J.
  5. 237 N.J. Super. 305 (1989)
 

NIGRO v. PLANNING BD.

237 N.J. Super. 305 (1989)

567 A.2d 1010

JAMES NIGRO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 20, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart R. Koenig argued the cause for appellant (Stickel, Koenig & Sullivan, attorneys; Stuart R. Koenig, on the brief).

Robert E. Martini argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges BILDER and ASHBEY.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by a planning board from a final judgment of the Law Division reversing its denial of an application for preliminary subdivision approval as unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious. Defendant Saddle River Planning Board contends the street layout of the proposed subdivision did not conform to the officially adopted official map; that the official map was statutorily conclusive with respect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases