1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 233 N.J.
  5. 233 N.J. Super. 259 (1989)
 

PRUDENTIAL v. CONTINENTAL INS.

233 N.J. Super. 259 (1989)

558 A.2d 848

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INS. CO., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND RONALD A. RUSSELL, JR., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Kaczka attorney for appellant (Paul E. Latterman, on the letter brief).

Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, attorneys for respondent Prudential Property & Casualty Ins. Co. (Margaret A. Wurzer, on the letter brief).

Respondent Ronald A. Russell, Jr.'s brief was suppressed.

Before Judges KING, BRODY and ASHBEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by ASHBEY, J.A.D.

This case involves a question of insurance "stacking." Riverside Township Police Officer Ronald A. Russell, Jr. was involved in an automobile accident while driving a police car. He sought uninsured (UM) motorist benefits from the Continental Insurance Company (Continental), insurer of the fleet of vehicles owned by Riverside Township (Township), and from Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases