1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 160 Ariz.
  5. 160 Ariz. 307 (1989)
 

COPELAND v. CITY OF YUMA

No. 1 CA-CV 88-266.

160 Ariz. 307 (1989)

772 P.2d 1160

Robert E. COPELAND and Gail M. Copeland, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF YUMA, an Arizona body politic; Roman O. Magdalena, an individual, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

April 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bilby & Shoenhair, P.C. by Kenneth L. Allen and Paul A. Relich, Tucson, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Mower, Koeller & Nebeker by Robert N. Clark, Yuma, for defendants-appellants.

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

On March 25, 1988, a jury returned a $40,000 verdict in plaintiffs' favor in a personal injury action against the City of Yuma and one of its employees. On April 13, 1988, defendants filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a motion for new trial. Because the motion was filed beyond the fifteen day time limit of Rule 59, 16 A.R.S. Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, it was stricken as untimely. On April 25, 1988, defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases