1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 233 N.J.
  5. 233 N.J. Super. 228 (1989)
 

GLADSTONE v. BERK

233 N.J. Super. 228 (1989)

558 A.2d 512

ROGER GLADSTONE, DAVID NUSSBAUM AND JONATHAN KRANTZ, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HARVEY J. BERK, CAROLYN M. BERK, WIFE OF HARVEY BERK, AND IRVING BERK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND LEO JOSEPHS, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 17, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen E. Samnick argued the cause for appellants, Harvey J. Berk and Irving Berk.

Irving Morris argued the cause for appellant Carolyn M. Berk (Greenberg, Margolis, Ziegler, Schwartz, Dratch, Fishman, Franzblau & Falkin, attorneys; Irving Morris, on the brief).

Nathan M. Edelstein argued the cause for respondents (Ridolfi, Friedman, Frank, Edelstein & Bernstein, attorneys; Nathan M. Edelstein, on the brief).

Before Judges LONG, MUIR, Jr. and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG, J.A.D.

These cases arise out of a relatively straightforward real estate deal pursuant to which plaintiffs Roger Gladstone, David Nussbaum and John Krantz agreed to buy an apartment complex in Lawrence Township owned by defendant Harvey Berk. The essential terms of the deal were negotiated and reduced to writing in a letter from Harvey1 to his attorney. Briefly, Harvey agreed to sell the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases