DILLARD DEPT. STORES v. ASSOC. MERCHAND.

No. 1 CA-CV 88-125.

162 Ariz. 294 (1989)

782 P.2d 1187

DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation; and Dayton Hudson Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, v. ASSOCIATED MERCHANDISING CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

November 9, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shannon & Cronin by John A. Shannon, Jr., Phoenix, for defendants-appellants.

O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears by Larry L. Smith and George H. Mitchell, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee.


JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether a broker which neither sold, manufactured, distributed, nor had any ownership or control over a product and which made no profit from its sale but which brought the manufacturer and seller together can be strictly liable for injuries resulting from that defective product. The trial court held that it could not, and granted summary judgment in favor of the broker. For the reasons expressed below, we...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases