1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 237 N.J.
  5. 237 N.J. Super. 184 (1989)
 

STATE v. BLOW

237 N.J. Super. 184 (1989)

567 A.2d 253

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RAYMOND BLOW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 6, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mordecai Garelick, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender, attorney, Mordecai Garelick, of counsel and on the brief).

Carol M. Henderson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney General, attorney, Carol M. Henderson, of counsel and on the letter brief).

Before Judges KING, SHEBELL and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, J.A.D.

The principal issue in this case is whether refusal to merge the defendant's convictions of possession of controlled dangerous substance (CDS) with intent to distribute and possession with intent to distribute within 1,000 feet of a school, as mandated by our Legislature, is constitutionally permissible. Defendant Raymond Blow appeals from the sentences imposed pursuant to a plea agreement with the Passaic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases