MILL RACE, LTD. v. MAYOR & TP. COMMITTEE


230 N.J. Super. 160 (1989)

553 A.2d 44

MILL RACE, LTD., A NEW JERSEY PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MAYOR & TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF BERNARDS TOWNSHIP, BERNARDS TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, AND COUNTRY PLACE ASSOCIATES, A NEW JERSEY PARTNERSHIP, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 27, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy E. Kurnos argued the cause for appellant (Murphy, Kurnos, Nish & Jabbour, attorneys; Raymond S. Papperman, on the brief).

Howard P. Shaw argued the cause for respondent Mayor & Township Committee of Bernards Township (Schenck, Price, Smith & King, attorneys; Howard P. Shaw and Anthony F. Della Pelle, on the brief).

Arthur H. Garvin, III argued the cause for respondent Bernards Township Planning Board (Kerby, Cooper, English, Schaul & Garvin, attorneys; Arthur H. Garvin, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, HAVEY and BROCHIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Mill Race, Ltd., appeals from the dismissal of its Law Division complaint on the basis that its claim was barred by the entire controversy doctrine.

For an understanding of this matter we must of necessity review the earlier suit urged here as a bar, N.J. Bldrs. Ass'n v. Bernards Tp., 211 N.J.Super. 290 (Law Div. 1985), aff'd

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases