1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 237 N.J.
  5. 237 N.J. Super. 142 (1989)
 

FERREIRA v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK

237 N.J. Super. 142 (1989)

567 A.2d 233

ALCIDES FERREIRA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 30, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Wopat, III argued the cause for appellant (Falvo & Wopat, attorneys; John W. Wopat, III, on the brief reply brief).

Anne S. Babineau argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Anne S. Babineau of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges KING and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

In this taxpayer's suit the plaintiff, Alcides Ferreira, a resident of Asbury Park, contends that the Law Division judge erred in summarily ruling that defendant, City of Asbury Park, could vacate a portion of Ocean Avenue and sell it and three parcels of ocean-front land to a private developer for urban renewal purposes. We disagree and affirm.

On August...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases