1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 163 Ariz.
  5. 163 Ariz. 206 (1989)
 

WALKER v. CITY OF SCOTTSDALE

No. 1 CA-CV 88-256.

163 Ariz. 206 (1989)

786 P.2d 1057

Myrna N. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, and the McCormick Ranch Property Owners' Association, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

Review Denied February 26, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dake, Hathaway & Goering, P.A. by Teresa W. Goering and T. Gale Dake, Phoenix, for plaintiff-appellant.

Jones, Skelton & Hochuli by Larry J. Cohen and Kevin D. Neal, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee McCormick Ranch.

Holloway & Thomas by Thomas P. Gannon, Paul W. Holloway and Marc A. Appel, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee City of Scottsdale.

OPINION

NELSON, Judge.

Myrna Walker appeals from the trial court's dismissal on summary judgment of her complaint against the City of Scottsdale (City) and the McCormick Ranch Property Owners' Association (Association). The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly construed A.R.S. § 33-1551, Arizona's recreational use statute, to limit the defendants' duty to Walker, thereby precluding her recovery.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases