STATE v. MOLINA


114 N.J. 181 (1989)

553 A.2d 332

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RUBIN MOLINA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 7, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Kervick, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender, attorney).

Julie Davidson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

In the companion case, State v. Baylass, 114 N.J. 169, decided today, we held that probation violations may be used on the "in-out" decision whether to revoke probation and incarcerate the defendant. We held further that a probation violation is neither an aggravating factor nor evidence of such a factor. The violation, however, may...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases