ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES v. DIVERSIFIED ATHLETIC

No. 87 C 5041.

707 F.Supp. 1506 (1989)

ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. DIVERSIFIED ATHLETIC SERVICES, d/b/a H. Julicher & Company, and Roger Lauritzen, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

January 19, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Hamilton, Katherine S. Dedrick, Keith L. Hunt, Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann, Hoban & Fuller, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

J. Herbert Landon, Erica Tina Helfer, Landon & Wojteczko, Ltd., Donal Rendler-Kaplan, Martin Y. Joseph, Katz, Kaplan & Associates, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NORDBERG, District Judge.

The Court referred plaintiff's motion for summary judgment to Magistrate James T. Balog for a Report and Recommendation. Magistrate Balog recommended that the Court deny plaintiff's motion and find that plaintiff has a duty to defend under the insurance policy at issue. Pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(b), plaintiff (hereinafter "St. Paul") filed specific written objections to the magistrate's report and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases