1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 736 F.Supp.
  5. 736 F.Supp. 1472 (1989)
 

OLMOS v. GOLDING

No. 88 C 8366.

736 F.Supp. 1472 (1989)

Gustavo OLMOS, Plaintiff, v. Ronald GOLDING, Individually, and Lind-Waldock & Company, an Illinois Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

November 16, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gustavo Olmos, South Pasadena, Cal., pro se.

Leslie A. Blau and Cacilia R. Masover, Winston & Strawn, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Frederick I. Bourg & Assoc., Frederick I. Bourg and David G. Duggan, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of defendants, Ronald Golding and Lind-Waldock & Company, brought pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(b), for summary judgment on the Second Amended Complaint of plaintiff, Gustavo Olmos. Briefing on this summary judgment motion has spawned two motions by defendants to strike affidavits submitted by Olmos and his attorney, Leslie A. Blau, in support of Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases