1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 721 F.Supp.
  5. 721 F.Supp. 1393 (1989)
 

ROGERS v. NATHAN

Civ. A. No. 89-2218.

721 F.Supp. 1393 (1989)

Tawanna M. ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. Derrick Tyrone NATHAN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

October 10, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nicholas S. Nunzio, Jr., McCarthy, Wilson & Ethridge, Rockville, for defendant Allstate Ins. Co.

Derrick Tyrone Nathan, Lorton, Va., pro se.

Charles Parsons, Reback and Parsons, for plaintiff.

ORDER

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the motion of Defendant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) to dismiss Plaintiff's claim against it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 12(h)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).

The Plaintiff, Tawanna M. Rogers, filed her complaint against Defendants Derrick Tyrone Nathan (Nathan) and Allstate alleging...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases