1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 730 F.Supp.
  5. 730 F.Supp. 1366 (1989)
 

RAMEY v. HAWK

No. 88-386-HC.

730 F.Supp. 1366 (1989)

Brown RAMEY, Plaintiff, v. K.M. HAWK, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division.

November 13, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown Ramey, Butner, N.C., pro se.

Loflin and Loflin, Thomas F. Loflin III, Durham, N.C., for plaintiff.

Eileen G. Coffey, Margaret Person Currin, U.S. Atty., R.A. Renfer, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Raleigh, N.C., for defendant.

JAMES C. FOX, District Judge.

On May 9, 1988, plaintiff filed this action challenging as unconstitutional a Disciplinary Hearing Office (hereinafter "DHO") action of December 3, 1987, where he was found to have committed the prohibited act of "Failing to Provide a Urine Sample." Thereafter plaintiff was allowed to file an Amended and Supplemental Complaint, wherein plaintiff petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus. In his Amended and Supplemental Complaint, plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases