1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 42 Ohio
  5. 42 Ohio St. 3d 164 (1989)
 

STATE EX REL. STAMPS v. AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING BD. OF MONTGOMERY CTY.

No. 88-682.

42 Ohio St. 3d 164 (1989)

THE STATE, EX REL. STAMPS, v. AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING BOARD OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 10, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brannon & Hall Law Offices and Dwight D. Brannon, for relator.

Lee C. Falke, prosecuting attorney, and Chris R. Van Schaik, for respondents.

Per Curiam.

Resolving this case requires us to answer the following questions. First, is a writ of mandamus available generally to prevent respondents from interfering in the execution of Stamps' duties? Second, is a writ of mandamus available to order application for the appointment of special counsel for Stamps? Third, is a writ of mandamus available to order the appointment of Nusbaum as supervisor of the center, and to order the approval of his salary?...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases