1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 708 F.Supp.
  5. 708 F.Supp. 1327 (1989)
 

PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. v. U.S.

Court No. 86-12-01546.

708 F.Supp. 1327 (1989)

PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Vitro Flex, S.A. and Cristales Inastillables de Mexico, S.A., Defendants-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

March 8, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stewart and Stewart, Terence P. Stewart and David Scott Nance, for plaintiff.

John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Platte B. Moring, III, for defendant.

Brownstein, Zeidman & Schomer, Irwin P. Altschuler and David R. Amerine, for defendants-intervenors.

OPINION

CARMAN, Judge:

The defendant Department of Commerce (Commerce) moves pursuant to Rule 71(a) of this Court to supplement the administrative record. The plaintiff, PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG), opposes the motion and claims that allowing Commerce to supplement the record to include a document it relied upon in making its determination would violate PPG's due process rights under the Fifth Amendment. PPG requests the document be excluded from the record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases