1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 708 F.Supp.
  5. 708 F.Supp. 1188 (1989)
 

GARY v. U.S.

Civ. A. No. 88-C-427.

708 F.Supp. 1188 (1989)

Samuel GARY and Nancy Gary, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

March 20, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Ramunno, Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs.

John D. Steffan, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

ORDER

CARRIGAN, District Judge.

This action arises out of Congress' decision in 1979 to impose an excise or severance tax on the windfall profits expected to result from the gradual decontrol of oil prices in the United States. Plaintiffs Samuel and Nancy Gary commenced this tax refund action to recover a windfall profit tax that they allege was unlawfully withheld. Jurisdiction is alleged to exist pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7422 and 28 U.S.C. §&...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases