1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 709 F.Supp.
  5. 709 F.Supp. 1176 (1989)
 

SCOTT v. CENTRAL MAINE POWER CO.

Civ. No. 85-0187 B.

709 F.Supp. 1176 (1989)

Robert F. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maine.

March 13, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Poulos, John S. Campbell, for plaintiff.

John H. Montgomery, Merton G. Henry, Brian C. Shaw, Jensen Baird Gardner & Henry, Portland, Me., for defendant Thurlow.

Cabanne Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Augusta, Me., for defendants Bradford and Moskovitz.

Charles A. Harvey, Michael T. Healy, Portland, Me., for defendants Central Maine Power, Ellis, Russell, Gorman, Titcomb, Dufour & Reed.

David T. Flanagan, Cent. Maine Power Co., Augusta, Me., for Cent. Maine Power Co.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CYR, Chief Judge.

Defendants Bradford and Moskovitz move to dismiss on the ground that they are absolutely immune from suit and, therefore, that the amended complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff objects to the United States Magistrate's recommendation that the motion to dismiss be granted, see Scott v. Central Maine Power Company, Civil No. 85-0187-B, Recommended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases