1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 790 F.Supp.
  5. 790 F.Supp. 1080 (1989)
 

ENFIELD v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO.

Nos. CIV-88-932-A, CIV-87-2032-A, CIV-88-1427-A, CIV-88-1508-A, CIV-88-1509-A, CIV-88-1525-A, CIV-88-1612-A and CIV-89-637-A.

790 F.Supp. 1080 (1989)

Patricia Ann ENFIELD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Marcy Lee HURD, and Gary C. Rhodes, Co-Trustees of the Marcy Lee Hurd Trust, Plaintiffs, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

October 17, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall J. Wood, Monte E. Johnson, Robert N. Barnes, Patranell B. Dykeman, Stack & Barnes, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs.

A.P. Murrah, Jr., Cleta Deatherage Mitchell, Roy J. Davis, Murrah & Davis, Oklahoma City, Okl., J. Randall Miller, Moyers Martin Santee Imel & Tetrick, Tulsa, Okl., for defendants.

ORDER

ALLEY, District Judge.

The defendant Atlantic Richfield Company ("ARCO") has moved to strike certain portions of plaintiffs' amended complaints, on the grounds that the new allegations are an attempt to circumvent the Court's Order of August 25, 1989. For several reasons, ARCO's motion is denied.

Initially, ARCO has failed to distinguish between cost of litigation and cost of mitigation. ARCO's central complaint appears to be that plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases