HOLMAN v. CAYCE

No. 88-5161.

873 F.2d 944 (1989)

Ronnie HOLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steve CAYCE, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided May 2, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. White, Jr., Reneau & Reneau, Celina, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellee.

Ernest D. Bennett, III, Sparta, Tenn., for City of Sparta, Tenn.

Ernest D. Bennett, III, Sparta, Tenn., for Carl Dilldine.

John E. Acuff (argued), Barnes & Acuff, Cookeville, Tenn., Robert H. Watson, Jr., Watson & Emert, Knoxville, Tenn., for Steve Cayce.

Before MARTIN, JONES and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.

The only issue presented on appeal in this civil action is whether a police officer, who refused to reveal the identity of his confidential informant, was properly held to be in contempt of court. Because the identity of the informant was protected from discovery by the "informer's privilege," we reverse the district court's order.

I.

Defendant, Steve Cayce, is a police officer for the City of Sparta, Tennessee. Acting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases