1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 718 F.Supp.
  5. 718 F.Supp. 1094 (1989)
 

U.S. v. BUDA

No. CR-88-150T.

718 F.Supp. 1094 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Peter BUDA, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

August 31, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

U.S. Attorney's Office (Bradley Tyler, Ass't U.S. Atty., of counsel), Rochester, N.Y., for plaintiff.

Terrence Connors, Buffalo, N.Y., for defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER

TELESCA, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant Peter Buda has moved to suppress evidence of a taped conversation with a Government informant made prior to his indictment on the grounds that the Government's prosecutor violated MODEL CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY DR 7-104(A)(1) when he consented to the wired communication without first notifying the defendant's attorney. For the reasons discussed below, I find the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases