1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 729 F.Supp.
  5. 729 F.Supp. 918 (1989)
 

DOYLE v. SHUBS

Civ. A. No. 87-2278-WD.

729 F.Supp. 918 (1989)

Natalie DOYLE and Gerald Doyle, Plaintiffs, v. Gerald A. SHUBS, M.D., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

November 22, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. Barry Tinkoff and Jeffrey S. Entin, Sahady, Entin & Entin, Fall River, Mass., for plaintiffs.

James E. McCambridge, III and Alan B. Rindler, Morrison, Mahoney & Miller, Boston, Mass., for defendant.

ORDER ON MOTION TO AMEND

WOODLOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiffs' counsel, Messrs. Tinkoff and Entin, have filed a document styled "Motion to Amend, Alter and/or Make Additional Findings by the Court Pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to the Memorandum and Order Dated September 18, 1989." ("Motion to Amend"). 721 F.Supp. 379. The September 18 Memorandum and Order allowed a belatedly raised request...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases