1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 709 F.Supp.
  5. 709 F.Supp. 887 (1989)
 

JACKSON v. FIRST FEDERAL SAV. OF ARKANSAS, F.A.

Nos. LR-C-86-560, LR-C-87-792 and LR-C-87-793.

709 F.Supp. 887 (1989)

Emily Joy JACKSON, Suing individually and on behalf of all other shareholders of First Federal Savings of Arkansas, F.A., similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS OF ARKANSAS, F.A., M.R. Godwin, H. Charles Johnston, James A. Coles and George B. Tyler, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, W.D.

January 13, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gene Mesh, Cincinnati, Ohio, Stanley R. Wolfe, Jeanne A. Markey, Berger & Montague, Philadelphia, Pa., H. William Allen, Allen, Cabe & Lester, Little Rock, Ark., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Richard J. Osterman, Jr., Trial Atty., Fed. Home Loan Bank Bd., Office of Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for FHLB.

John M. Skrhak and Douglas E. Yeager, Berman, Fichtner & Mitchell, Dallas, Tex., John E. Pruniski, III, Phil Campbell, Hilburn, Bethune, Calhoon, Harper & Pruniski, Ltd., North Little Rock, Ark., for defendants.

Philip E. Kaplan, Kaplan, Brewer & Miller, Little Rock, Ark., for H. Charles Johnston.

Robert S. Lindsey, Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, Little Rock, Ark., for Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. and Prudential-Bache Securities.

Stephen Engstrom, Wilson Law Firm, Little Rock, Ark., Charles Lee Eisen, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Washington, D.C., for Kaplan, Smith & Associates.

ORDER

EISELE, Chief Judge.

This is a securities fraud case brought against a federal savings and loan association and several of its officers by some of its stockholders. Now pending before the Court is a procedurally unusual dispute over plaintiff's access to documents in the hands of a federal agency, and a motion to strike. The motions will be addressed in that order.

I. DISCOVERY MOTION

A. Facts

In plaintiff's amended first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases