1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 115 N.J.
  5. 115 N.J. 30 (1989)
 

MATTER OF BARKER

115 N.J. 30 (1989)

556 A.2d 1190

IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD D. BARKER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 28, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robyn M. Hill, Acting Chief Counsel, Disciplinary Review Board, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Richard D. Barker argued the cause pro se.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of the determination of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) to treat as a presentment, the recommendation of the District XIV Ethics Committee for Mercer County (the Ethics Committee) that respondent be privately reprimanded. The Disciplinary Review Board unanimously agreed with the Ethics Committee's findings of unethical conduct but was unable to agree on the appropriate discipline. A majority of the DRB recommended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases