1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 706 F.Supp.
  5. 706 F.Supp. 733 (1989)
 

HOLMES v. PACIFIC MUT. LIFE INS. CO.

No. CV-SA-88-388-JSL.

706 F.Supp. 733 (1989)

Edward HOLMES, Sherri Estelle Holmes and Edward Zachory Holmes, Plaintiffs, v. PACIFIC MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Los Angeles Division.

January 18, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marian H. Tully, Shernoff, Scott & Bidart, Claremont, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Lonnie E. Woolverton, Adams, Duque & Hazeltine, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

OPINION

LETTS, District Judge.

FACTS

This case presents novel facts against which to test the scope of ERISA's preemption clause, 29 U.S.C. § 1144(a), of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.

The facts alleged by Plaintiffs, which are accepted as true for the purposes of this decision, are as follows. Plaintiffs' decedent, Dolores Holmes, was an employee of Fountain Valley Hospital. She was also...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases