1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 706 F.Supp.
  5. 706 F.Supp. 706 (1989)
 

U.S. v. SOLOMONSON

No. 3-88 CR 73.

706 F.Supp. 706 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Conrad Bruce SOLOMONSON, a/k/a C. Bruce Solomonson, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.

March 8, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry J. Shea, Asst. U.S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff.

Joseph A. Walters, Robert A. Brunig, and Corey J. Ayling, O'Connor & Hannan, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant.

ORDER DENYING APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS

DEVITT, District Judge.

Defendant, convicted of eight counts of mail fraud and one count of bank fraud, has filed a notice of appeal and moves under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 that he be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff opposes the motion.

Defendant's affidavit in support of the motion recites the language of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 and supplies some, but not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases