U.S. v. BERNAL

No. 87-1930.

871 F.2d 490 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario BERNAL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 4, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Luke Ashey, Dallas, Tex. (court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Mario A. Bernal, Federal Correctional Institution, Tucson, Ariz., pro se.

Andrew Levchuk, Dept. of Justice, Criminal Div., Appellate Section, Washington, D.C., Marvin Collins, U.S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GOLDBERG, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


(Opinion Nov. 25, 1988, 5th Cir. 1989, 861 F.2d 434)

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The application for rehearing is denied.

We are persuaded that Rule 11(h) was not intended to nullify important objectives of Rule 11. No objective of Rule 11 is more important than that established in Rule 11(c):

(c) Advice to Defendant. Before accepting a plea of guilty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases