1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 709 F.Supp.
  5. 709 F.Supp. 620 (1989)
 

SCHEMBERG v. PROGRESSIVE CAS. INS. CO.

Civ. A. No. 88-9804.

709 F.Supp. 620 (1989)

Karl SCHEMBERG v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INS. CO.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

As Amended April 27, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth M. Rodgers, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

James C. Haggerty, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

CAHN, District Judge.

This case involves a dispute between the plaintiff and his insurance company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company ("Progressive"), over whether an offset provision in an automobile insurance policy is invalid as contrary to public policy. I hold that the offset provision violates public policy. Thus I will grant the plaintiff's motion to compel arbitration, and I will deny Progressive's motion for judgment on the pleadings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases