1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 713 F.Supp.
  5. 713 F.Supp. 575 (1989)
 

CLIFFORD CORP., N.V. v. INGBER

No. 88 Civ. 3405 (JMW).

713 F.Supp. 575 (1989)

CLIFFORD CORPORATION, N.V., Plaintiff, v. Alfred INGBER, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 27, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip LeB. Douglas, Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, New York City, for plaintiff.

James J. Harrington, Haythe & Curley, New York City, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WALKER, District Judge:

This court, like all federal courts, has a "virtually unflagging obligation ... to exercise jurisdiction given to [it]." Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 817, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 1246, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976). However, a federal court must first ensure that it has, in fact, been given jurisdiction to hear a matter. Federal subject matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases