1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 729 F.Supp.
  5. 729 F.Supp. 449 (1989)
 

JOY MFG. CORP. v. PULLMAN-PEABODY CO.

Civ. A. No. 86-2592.

729 F.Supp. 449 (1989)

JOY MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff, v. The PULLMAN-PEABODY COMPANY, Thomas M. Begel, Gerald R. Ford, Jane Mack Gould, John E. McConnaughy, Jr., Edward A. Montgomery, Jr., James R. Shepley, Steven Shulman, Yedco Partners L.P., Yed Corp., CCI Acquisition Corp. and Pullman Acquisition Company, Defendants, and Cynthia Berger, Custodian for Andrew C. Berger, Plaintiff in Intervention.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

December 1, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Tomlinson Fort, Reed Smith Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Michael P. Malakoff, Berger, Kapetan, Malakoff & Meyers, P.C., Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff in intervention.

William M. Wycoff, Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.

OPINION

DIAMOND, District Judge.

The matter presently before the court is a petition for attorneys' fees filed by proposed intervenor, Cynthia Berger. For the reasons which follow, the motion will be granted.

I. Background

Commencing sometime in September 1986, the defendant Pullman-Peabody Company ("Pullman") contacted the plaintiff, Joy Manufacturing Corporation ("Joy"), through the latter's President, Chairman, and Chief Executive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases