1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 781 P.2d
  5. 781 P.2d 378 (1989)
 

FOX v. BEAR CREEK CORPORATION

87-2998-J; CA A50644.

781 P.2d 378 (1989)

99 Or.App. 90

John FOX, Appellant, v. BEAR CREEK CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, and Harry & David, an Oregon Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 25, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul B. Gamson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Margaret S. Olney and Durham, Drummonds, Smith & Wiser, Portland.

Charles F. Adams, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Harry S. Chandler and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

WARREN, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action for breach of an employment contract. The trial court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff began working for defendants in 1972 in a nonsupervisory position.1 Within six years he had worked up to a management position and, when he was terminated, his title was Vice President, Operations Planning. In August or September, 1986, he was assigned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases