1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 42 Ohio
  5. 42 Ohio St. 3d 73 (1989)
 

STATE EX REL. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF COMMRS. v. STATE PERSONNEL BD. OF REVIEW

No. 88-202.

42 Ohio St. 3d 73 (1989)

[THE STATE, EX REL.] CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, APPELLANT, v. STATE PERSONNEL BOARD OF REVIEW, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 19, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thompson, Hine, & Flory, William C. Moul, William R. Case, Keith A. Ashmus, John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, Kevin Purcell and Richard A. Wise, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Theodore Scott, Jr., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

A writ of prohibition will not issue unless relator establishes that the court or officer against whom it is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law, and it will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists. State, ex rel. Yates, v. Court of Appeals for Montgomery Cty. (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 30, 33, 512 N...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases