1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 718 F.Supp.
  5. 718 F.Supp. 413 (1989)
 

LUTZ v. CHROMATEX, INC.

Civ. No. 88-1764.

718 F.Supp. 413 (1989)

Carl LUTZ and Deborah Lutz, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHROMATEX, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

June 9, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Ronca, Schmidt & Ronca, P.C., Harrisburg, Pa., and Gerald J. Williams, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

John Gerard Whelly, Jr., Wilkes-Barre, Pa., Robert Ufberg, Scranton, Pa., Daniel Segal, David Richman, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., Thomas B. Schmidt, III, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Harrisburg, Pa., Ronald J. Worobey, Scranton, Pa., C. George Caudle, Caldwell, Heggie & Helton, Chattanooga, Tenn., Donald W. Stever, New York City, Anthony R. Sherr, Sherr, Joffe & Zuckerman, West Conshohocken, Pa., and Robert F. DiUbaldo, New York City, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEALON, District Judge.

Currently before the court in this action filed pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (CERCLA), and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq. (RCRA), are defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiffs' amended complaint. For the reasons that follow, defendants' motions to dismiss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases