1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 709 F.Supp.
  5. 709 F.Supp. 396 (1989)
 

PROULX v. CITIBANK, N.A.

Nos. 84 Civ. 8156 (MBM), 85 Civ. 4348 (MBM).

709 F.Supp. 396 (1989)

Michael PROULX, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Minna J. Kotkin, Concettina Sacheli and Dominique Penson, Legal Interns, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiff.

Bettina B. Plevan, Andrew P. Marks, Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

MUKASEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Michael Proulx sued initially for sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982). He was awarded summary judgment on a claim that his discharge by defendant Citibank was in retaliation for a sexual harassment complaint he filed with the New York State Division of Human Rights ("DHR"), even though that DHR...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases