1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 717 F.Supp.
  5. 717 F.Supp. 368 (1989)
 

LAYTON v. AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.

Civ. No. JFM-89-371.

717 F.Supp. 368 (1989)

Robert LAYTON, et al. v. AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

July 25, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A.J. Hohman, Jr., Hope, Hohman & Georges, San Antonio, Tex., and Mitchell Stevan, Weinstock, Stevan & Harris, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiffs.

David B. Isbill, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

MOTZ, District Judge.

This action arises out of a dispute concerning an AAMCO franchise. Plaintiffs are the franchisees, Robert and Sue Layton and Ste-Mar Inc., a corporation owned by the Laytons; the defendants are AAMCO Transmissions, Inc. and Robert Morgan and Abraham Bernstein, who were during the times relevant to this suit directors and, respectively, the chairman and president of AAMCO. Plaintiffs assert claims for common law fraud, violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases