1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 696 F.Supp.
  5. 696 F.Supp. 262 (1988)
 

ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORP. v. MESKO

No. 88-CV-72143-DT.

696 F.Supp. 262 (1988)

ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORPORATION, a New York corporation, Plaintiff, v. Daniel R. MESKO, Roger A. Mesko and Water-Wise, Inc., a Michigan corporation, jointly and severally, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

October 4, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley J. Schram, Bloomfield Hills, Mich., for plaintiff.

Donald J. Gasiorek, Lionel J. Postic, Southfield, Mich., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZATKOFF, District Judge.

This action arises out of a former employment relationship between the individual Defendants and Plaintiff. Currently before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) tests the legal sufficiency of the Plaintiffs' Complaint. Davey v. Tomlinson, 627 F.Supp. 1458...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases