1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 703 F.Supp.
  5. 703 F.Supp. 215 (1988)
 

BROKKE v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO.

Civ. No. B-87-689(WWE).

703 F.Supp. 215 (1988)

Mervin E. BROKKE, Plaintiff, v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO., Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc., Unilever United States, Inc., Imperial Chemical Industries, Akzo America, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

December 28, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph N. Varon, Victoria de Toledo of Wynn, Casper & de Toledo, Stamford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Mary Eigel Schifferli of MacMillian & Associates, Stamford, Conn., for defendants.

ORDER

EGINTON, District Judge.

After review and over objection, the considered and well-reasoned opinion of the magistrate is ADOPTED, RATIFIED, and AFFIRMED.

MAGISTRATE'S OPINION

THOMAS P. SMITH, United States Magistrate.

This is an action brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (Count One), and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases