1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 677 F.Supp.
  5. 677 F.Supp. 168 (1988)
 

FEINMAN v. SCHULMAN BERLIN & DAVIS

No. 86 Civ. 7942 (SWK).

677 F.Supp. 168 (1988)

Robert FEINMAN, Burton Laskin, Barry Lief, Marvin Weissman, Bernard Pliskin, Emanuel Pokart and R & P Energy Associates Limited Partnership, Plaintiffs, v. SCHULMAN BERLIN & DAVIS, Mark A. Berlin, William Apuzzo and Stanley Blay, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 11, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rochman, Platzer & Fallick, New York City by Barry M. Fallick, for defendants Schulman, Berlin & Davis and Mark A. Berlin.

Schulman & Berlin, P.C., New York City by Robert D. Schulman, for defendant William Apuzzo.

Newman Schlau Fitch & Burns, P.C., New York City by Philip Schlau, for defendant Stanley Blay.

Stanley Blay, Brooklyn, pro se.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this securities fraud action pursuant to § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated thereunder, and state law, including § 352-c of the General Business Law of New York ("Martin Act"). Plaintiffs claim they were defrauded by their participation in a limited partnership. Defendants are lawyers who...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases