1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 705 F.Supp.
  5. 705 F.Supp. 128 (1988)
 

DIVERSIFIED MARKETING, INC. v. ESTEE LAUDER, INC.

No. 87 Civ. 7228 (SWK).

705 F.Supp. 128 (1988)

DIVERSIFIED MARKETING, INC., Plaintiff, v. ESTEE LAUDER, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 5, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank J. Colluci, New York City, for plaintiff.

Weiss, Dawid, Fross, Zelnick & Lehrman, New York City by Allan Zelnick and Janet L. Hoffman, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Diversified Marketing, Inc. ("Diversified"), brings this action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief seeking a declaration that its advertising campaign for its cosmetic products does not violate federal trademark law or similar New York state statutory and common law principles. Defendant, Estee Lauder, Inc. ("Estee Lauder"), has counterclaimed on the basis of these laws and has now...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases