1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 756 P.2d
  5. 756 P.2d 66 (1988)
 

TRIENCO, INC. v. APPLIED THEORY, INC.

CV 86-0428; CA A43411.

756 P.2d 66 (1988)

91 Or.App. 588

TRIENCO, INC., a Colorado Corporation, Appellant, v. APPLIED THEORY, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 22, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Roy, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Ronald T. Adams, James F. Dalton and Rappleyea, Beck, Helterline, Spencer & Roskie, Portland.

James E. Eickelberg, Corvallis, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Eickelberg & Fewel, Corvallis.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and GRABER, JJ.

WARDEN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint for breach of contract after a trial to the court. It contends that the trial court erred in holding that no contract was formed.

Plaintiff is a Colorado corporation which designs and manufactures an optical scanning device, known as an Edger, for use in the forest products industry. Defendant is an Oregon corporation which sells and installs automated lumber handling systems...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases