1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 206 Cal.App.3d
  5. 206 Cal.App.3d 611 (1988)
 

LAWRENCE v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B036091.

206 Cal.App.3d 611 (1988)

253 Cal. Rptr. 748

ARTHUR LAWRENCE et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; OPPENHEIM, APPEL, DIXON & CO., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

December 13, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Arthur Lawrence, Lorraine Howell, in pro. per., Rich & Ezer and Mitchell J. Ezer for Petitioners.

De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, and Frederick R. Bennett, Assistant County Counsel, for Respondent.

Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, Edward M. Rosenfeld and Roger M. Rosen for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

LILLIE, P.J.

Petitioners seek a writ of mandate directing the superior court to vacate its order denying petitioners' peremptory challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6, which denial was based on a finding that the challenge was untimely, and compelling the court to disqualify Judge Diane Wayne, assign a new judge to the case, and vacate all orders made by Judge Wayne after the filing of petitioners' peremptory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases