1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 695 F.Supp.
  5. 695 F.Supp. 112 (1988)
 

ROGERS v. GRIMALDI

Nos. 86 Civ. 1851 (RWS), 86 Civ. 7481 (RWS).

695 F.Supp. 112 (1988)

Ginger ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. Alberto GRIMALDI and MGM/UA Entertainment Co., Defendants. Ginger ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. PEA PRODUZIONI EUROPEE ASSOCIATE, S.R.L., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 5, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bower & Gardner, New York City, for plaintiff; Barry G. Saretsky, Alan G. Katz, of counsel.

Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn, New York City, for defendants; Stephen F. Huff, Tom J. Ferber, Charles B. McKenna, of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Alberto Grimaldi ("Grimaldi"), MGM/UA Entertainment Co. ("MGM") and PEA Produzioni Europee Associate, s.r.l. ("PEA") (collectively, "Defendants") have moved pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment dismissing the complaints of plaintiff Ginger Rogers ("Rogers") in their entirety. Upon the findings and conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted.

What must be determined here is the boundary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases