1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 296 S.C.
  5. 296 S.C. 480 (1988)
 

STATE v. COTO

22928

296 S.C. 480 (1988)

374 S.E.2d 181

The STATE, Respondent v. Milton E. COTO, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided November 28, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Kassel, of Suggs & Kelly, P.A., Columbia, on behalf of A.C.L.U. of the South Carolina Foundation, for appellant.

T. Travis Medlock, Atty. Gen., Harold M. Coombs, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Gwendolyn L. Fuller, Staff Atty. and James C. Anders, Sol., Columbia, for respondent.

Heard Oct. 21, 1988.

Decided Nov. 28, 1988.

Per Curiam:

The record does not indicate, and no determination was made, that Appellant's waiver of counsel was knowing and intelligent. Accordingly, the case is reversed and remanded for a new trial. State v. Bateman, ___ S.C. ___, 373 S.E.2d 470 (1988); see also Faretta v. California, 422 U...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases