FRONNING v. BLUME

No. C9-88-855.

429 N.W.2d 310 (1988)

Melvin FRONNING, et al., Appellants, v. John BLUME, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied November 30, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard S. Roberts, Richard S. Roberts & Associates, Wheaton, for appellants.

Wickham Corwin, Conmy, Feste, Bossart, Hubbard & Corwin, Ltd., Fargo, N.D., for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., and RANDALL and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellants brought an action alleging respondents fraudulently obtained a mortgage against appellants' property and that respondents acted in bad faith by denying appellant future credit and refusing to release discretionary loan funds. The trial court granted respondents summary judgment on both issues. Appellants now seek relief. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Appellant Leslie Fronning and his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases