1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 696 F.Supp.
  5. 696 F.Supp. 29 (1988)
 

DISTRICT 65, UAW v. HARPER & ROW PUBLISHERS, INC.

Nos. 82 Civ. 3657(MGC), 82 Civ. 4042(MGC).

696 F.Supp. 29 (1988)

DISTRICT 65, UAW, Renee Cafiero, and William Monroe, Plaintiffs, v. HARPER & ROW PUBLISHERS, INC.; Minneapolis Star & Tribune Company; Marvin A. Asnes; Simon M. Bessie; Cass Canfield, Jr.; Kenneth B. Clark; Winthrop Knowlton; Barton H. Lippincott; Joseph W. Lippincott, Jr.; Gertrude G. Michelson; Brooks Thomas; John Cowles, Jr.; Otto A. Silha; Norman L. Cannon; Chester L. Logan; Edward A. Miller; Howard Aksen; Edward Hutton; Jane Isay; Prudential Insurance Company of America; and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Defendants. Raymond C. HARWOOD, Carolyn Reed and Glen Howard, on their own behalf and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HARPER & ROW PUBLISHERS, INC., Minneapolis Star & Tribune Company, Marvin A. Asnes, Simon M. Bessie, Cass Canfield, Jr., Kenneth B. Clark, Winthrop Knowlton, Barton H. Lippincott, Joseph W. Lippincott, Jr., Gertrude G. Michelson, Brooks Thomas, John Cowles Jr., Otto A. Silha, Norman L. Cannon, Chester L. Logan, Edward A. Miller, Howard Aksen, Edward Hutton, Jane Isay, and Fred A. Taylor, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 29, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shea & Gould by Stuart A. Smith, Martin H. Samson, New York City, for plaintiffs Raymond C. Harwood et al.

Dreyer & Traub by Eugene Mittelman, New York City, for plaintiffs District 65, UAW et al.

Lawrence F. Landgraff, Gary M. Ford, Robert L. Furst, Stephen D. Schrieber, Kenton Hambrick, Washington, D.C., for Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. Office of the Gen. Counsel.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges by Nancy E. Barton, Dennis J. Block, Richard L. Levine, New York City, Attys. for the Harper & Row defendants.

OPINION

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

These two cases, which arise under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), have been consolidated for pre-trial purposes, and have already been the subject of three published opinions, reported at 670 F.Supp. 550 (S.D.N.Y.1987), 586 F.Supp. 118 (S.D.N.Y.1984) and 576 F.Supp. 1468 (S.D.N.Y.1983)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases