1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 680 F.Supp.
  5. 680 F.Supp. 33 (1988)
 

PATLEX CORP. v. QUIGG

Civ. A. No. 86-3294.

680 F.Supp. 33 (1988)

PATLEX CORPORATION and Gordon Gould, Plaintiffs, v. Donald J. QUIGG, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

February 23, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R.V. Lupo and Jack Q. Lever, Lupo, Lipman & Lever, P.C., Washington, D.C., and Roy H. Wepner, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, Westfield, N.J., for plaintiffs.

Fred E. McKelvey, Joseph F. Nakamura and Charles A. Wendel, Arlington, Va., for defendants.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Gordon Gould and Patlex Corporation seek review of a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the "Board") upholding an examiner's rejection on reexamination of all three claims of United States Patent No. 4,161,436 (the "'436 patent"). The patent claims a method of energizing a material by utilizing a light amplifying apparatus. Three issues are before the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases