1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 694 F.Supp.
  5. 694 F.Supp. 1 (1988)
 

MERCK & CO., INC. v. DANBURY PHARMACAL, INC.

Civ. A. No. 86-588 MMS.

694 F.Supp. 1 (1988)

MERCK & CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. DANBURY PHARMACAL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

August 31, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Norman Veasey, and Robert W. Whetzel, of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff; Joseph M. Fitzpatrick, and Nicholas M. Cannella, of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, New York City, of counsel.

Jeffrey M. Weiner, Wilmington, Del., for defendant; Alfred B. Engelberg, Carmel, N.Y., of counsel.

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff-patentee Merck & Co., Inc. ("Merck"), is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of New Jersey, with its principal place of business in Rahway, New Jersey. Pretrial Order, Dkt. 53, at 5 ("Pretrial Order"). The defendant Danbury Pharmacal, Inc. ("Danbury"), is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, with its principal place of business in Danbury, Connecticut....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases